Re: Distinguish between regional undo and undo to the beginning in undo-equiv-table

[Stefan Monnier]

> I think that’s fine. If the entry disappeared, that means either the key or
> the value is no longer in the undo list, no?

Yes (in practice, it's usually the value which disappears first, since
the value is supposed to be "older" and these things normally disappear
as a result of undo-log truncation).


        Stefan