Re: Opportunistic GC

[Stefan Kangas]

Pip Cet <pipcet@gmail.com> writes:

> Note that none of this is "real" GC: we still mark and sweep, just in
> a slightly smarter way.

Do you see any significant pros (or cons) to the approach you suggest as
compared to a generational GC?

Would we want/need to move to a generational GC if we had what you
describe?