[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Aug 2021 13:52:46 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> M-- C-x 4 C-/ winner-redo
>
> This way, a winner undo has the same binding as editing undo, but under C-x
> 4, which means window management stuff.
>
> (Also: is there any reason we shouldn't enable winner by default?)
IIUC these features somewhat overlap with the (new) features introduced
with the (frame-level) tab-bar, so it would likely be good to try and
integrate them better.
As for a key-binding, `C-x 4` might be a good prefix for it, tho note
that `C-x 5` is also a good choice (since winner does not operate on
a window but on the windows within a frame).
Count me as a vote in favor of using a key-binding like the one you suggest.
> Likewise, for windmove, we can bind C-x 4 {left, right, up, down} and DWIM
> for people automatically, enabled by default.
That sounds even better (and we could have similar commands in `C-x 5`
to select frames based on their location on the screen).
Stefan
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, (continued)
Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Phil Sainty, 2021/08/21
Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Teemu Likonen, 2021/08/22
Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Arthur Miller, 2021/08/21
Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Juri Linkov, 2021/08/22
Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove,
Stefan Monnier <=
Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/08/22
Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Boruch Baum, 2021/08/22