[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gitlab Migration
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: Gitlab Migration |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:47:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 11:42:41AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 09:57:34 +0200
> > From: <tomas@tuxteam.de>
> >
> > > [...] forking [Gitlab] and developing our own version free of those
> > > problems? [...]
> > In that case, it seems advisable to understand first why this strategy
> > didn't work out with debbugs [...]
> Is it really hard to understand? The usual reason is availability of
> resources.
Yes, perhaps. But then, Gitlab could be potentially more costly (more
code, faster cycles these days, etc.).
Cheers
- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: Gitlab Migration, (continued)
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/26
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/08/26
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/26
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/08/26
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/26
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Yuchen Pei, 2021/08/27
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Werner LEMBERG, 2021/08/28
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/28
- Re: Gitlab Migration, tomas, 2021/08/28
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/28
- Re: Gitlab Migration,
tomas <=
- Re: Gitlab Migration, dick, 2021/08/26
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/26
- Re: Gitlab Migration, tomas, 2021/08/27
- Re: Gitlab Migration, dick, 2021/08/27
- Re: Gitlab Migration, tomas, 2021/08/27
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/27
Re: Gitlab Migration, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/08/26
Re: Gitlab Migration, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/08/26