Re: Why not set Emacs development workflow based on the popular git forges (GitHub, Bitbucket, Gitlab, ect)?

[tomas]

On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 02:55:35PM +0800, Hongyi Zhao wrote:
> Nowadays, the large software projects often conduct the development on
> the workflow supplied by git  forges (GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab,
> etc.). But it seems that Emacs is still developed directly on git, as
> described here [1], which makes maintaining GNU Emacs development a
> lot of extra work.
> 
> So, why not set Emacs development workflow based on the popular git forges?

There is an enormous discussion about this in this very mailing list
(starting around endo of August and still ongoing, with well over
300 posts.

Are you aware of it? Perhaps there might be some iteresting aspects
in there for you.

Cheers
 - t

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature