RE: [External] : Re: NonGNU ELPA work

[Drew Adams]

> > Is it supposed to mean code distributed by GNU
> > Emacs (e.g., in one of its repositories) that's
> > not considered _part of_ GNU Emacs?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > Is it meant to stand for code that doesn't respect some GNU
> standards?
> 
> Packages in NonGNU ELPA mainly need to conform to some basic
> philosophical standards, such as not recommending proprietary software.
> 
> > Code that isn't assigned to FSF/GNU?
> 
> Yes, otherwise it should go to GNU ELPA.

Where, besides your reply, is all this specified?
Is "NonGNU" the best, or even a good, name for this?