[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pure space overflows
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: Pure space overflows |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Jan 2022 19:02:49 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
>> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>> Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 17:38:25 +0800
>>
>> > And why BASE_PURESIZE and not SYSTEM_PURESIZE_EXTRA for those
>> > configurations?
>>
>> Isn't that a relic from when we had separate headers for each machine
>> and configuration?
>
> No, not yet a relic.
>
>> I couldn't find anywhere they are set today.
>
> See src/conf_post.h.
I wonder if the following code being under an MSDOS conditional is an
oversight, since it mentions GNU/Linux:
#ifdef HAVE_X_WINDOWS
/* We need a little extra space, see ../../lisp/loadup.el and the
commentary below, in the non-X branch. The 140KB number was
measured on GNU/Linux and on MS-Windows. */
#define SYSTEM_PURESIZE_EXTRA (-170000+140000)
Thanks.
- Pure space overflows, Po Lu, 2022/01/22
- Re: Pure space overflows, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/22
- Re: Pure space overflows, Po Lu, 2022/01/22
- Re: Pure space overflows, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/22
- Re: Pure space overflows,
Po Lu <=
- Re: Pure space overflows, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/22
- Re: Pure space overflows, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/22
- Re: Pure space overflows, Po Lu, 2022/01/22
- Re: Pure space overflows, Po Lu, 2022/01/23
- Re: Pure space overflows, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/23
- Re: Pure space overflows, Po Lu, 2022/01/23
- Re: Pure space overflows, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/23
- Re: Pure space overflows, Andreas Schwab, 2022/01/23
- Re: Pure space overflows, Po Lu, 2022/01/23
- Re: Pure space overflows, Andreas Schwab, 2022/01/23