[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pure space overflows
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Pure space overflows |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Jan 2022 13:13:14 +0200 |
> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 19:02:49 +0800
>
> > See src/conf_post.h.
>
> I wonder if the following code being under an MSDOS conditional is an
> oversight, since it mentions GNU/Linux:
>
> #ifdef HAVE_X_WINDOWS
> /* We need a little extra space, see ../../lisp/loadup.el and the
> commentary below, in the non-X branch. The 140KB number was
> measured on GNU/Linux and on MS-Windows. */
> #define SYSTEM_PURESIZE_EXTRA (-170000+140000)
No, not an oversight. This is for a MS-DOS build with X support.
(Yes, we actually had that at some point, and we still have *.inp
files in the msdos/ directory to support it, although I'd be very
surprised if such a build could be made today.)
- Pure space overflows, Po Lu, 2022/01/22
- Re: Pure space overflows, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/22
- Re: Pure space overflows, Po Lu, 2022/01/22
- Re: Pure space overflows, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/22
- Re: Pure space overflows, Po Lu, 2022/01/22
- Re: Pure space overflows,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Pure space overflows, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/22
- Re: Pure space overflows, Po Lu, 2022/01/22
- Re: Pure space overflows, Po Lu, 2022/01/23
- Re: Pure space overflows, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/23
- Re: Pure space overflows, Po Lu, 2022/01/23
- Re: Pure space overflows, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/23
- Re: Pure space overflows, Andreas Schwab, 2022/01/23
- Re: Pure space overflows, Po Lu, 2022/01/23
- Re: Pure space overflows, Andreas Schwab, 2022/01/23
- Re: Pure space overflows, Po Lu, 2022/01/23