Re: [PATCH] Re: Other details about completion.

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Ergus <spacibba@aol.com> writes:

> 1) I think it is more intuitive to invert and use the M-S-<arrow>
> minibuffer-choose-** and M-<arrow> for
> minibuffer-{previous|next}-completion for not insert commands...

I was a bit surprised at how M-<down> worked -- I had expected it to
work like M-S-<down> works, really.  But after using it a few times, I
think it the M-<down> action makes more ergonomic sense, so I'd rather
keep it the way Juri has it now.

> 2) The M-<up>/M-<down> is not intuitive when completions are not in
> one-column format, and the M-<left>/M-<right> cannot be used because
> they are already taken..

I agree with that -- I expected M-<down> to work on the visually
displayed completions, not the logical order.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no