Re: [PATCH] Re: Other details about completion.

[Juri Linkov]

>> icomplete is based on post-command-hook, so zcomplete would need it too.
>
> Sorry, not agree here. If zcomplete intention is to emulate the zsh
> behavior then it is not needed to use post-command-hook. Completions are
> shown on demand <tab>... post-command-hook is for a behavior more like
> browsers... We already have helm, ivy, icomplete, vertico, selectrum,
> ido, fido (with the vertical variants too) and all the others... I don't
> think we need more of that and reinvent the well once again.
>
> Simple in better than complicated ;)

Earlier you suggested to add a new minor mode, but now you say
that a minor mode is complicated.  Isn't this a contradiction? ;)

And the same find-as-you-type autocompletion like in browsers
is supported by zsh as well:
https://github.com/marlonrichert/zsh-autocomplete