[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PGTK-related misconceptions
From: |
Eric Abrahamsen |
Subject: |
Re: PGTK-related misconceptions |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Apr 2022 09:24:14 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> writes:
> Morgan Smith <morgan.j.smith@outlook.com> writes:
>
>> I'd like to report that my super key stopped registering. I suspected
>> commit 1404e16975 caused it so I did a quick `git revert 1404e16975`
>> ontop of 807682de1e and that fixed it.
>
> Crystal ball says you are using X Windows, and have to put
>
> remove mod4 = Hyper_L
>
> in your ~/.Xmodmap file, because GTK doesn't try as hard as regular X11
> Emacs to work around the common kind of virtual modifier
> misconfiguration.
>
> People using X should _never_ use PGTK. The regular X build does a much
> better job at supporting that than PGTK ever will.
Hey, thanks for this! I'd set --with-pgtk on my X11 machine ages ago,
not even knowing why, and reconfiguring without that flag solved my
problems with "C-;" being received as plain ";" (and some other funky
key misreadings). This is why we don't copy-n-paste config!
Thanks again,
Eric
- PGTK-related misconceptions, Po Lu, 2022/04/14
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Byung-Hee HWANG, 2022/04/15
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions,
Eric Abrahamsen <=
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Sean Whitton, 2022/04/18
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Po Lu, 2022/04/18
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Sean Whitton, 2022/04/18
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Po Lu, 2022/04/18
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Sean Whitton, 2022/04/18
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Jim Porter, 2022/04/18
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Po Lu, 2022/04/18
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Sean Whitton, 2022/04/18
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Tim Cross, 2022/04/18
- Re: PGTK-related misconceptions, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/04/19