Re: master ed84f24a21: Make `signal-process' allow completing over signal names

[Po Lu]

Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> Oh, you mean the loop ends one too early?  Yes, that's true.  Can't have
> new code without at least one off-by-one error; that's illegal.

I also meant that the loop should end at NSIG - 1, or SIGRTMAX, instead
of an arbitrary number (254).

> That was my original assumption, but we apparently check the OS for
> sig2str via autoconf, I discovered yesterday.  config.h:
>
> /* Define to 1 if you have the `sig2str' function. */
> /* #undef HAVE_SIG2STR */

Ah, now I remember.  It also exists on some proprietary Unices and very
old versions of GNU/Linux.