Re: Deprecation of define-key?

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel@gmail.com> writes:

> Wouldn't it make sense to let keymap-set take multiple key-definition
> pairs as arguments, like setq et al?  This would be very convenient
> e.g. in user configuration files, where currently one often finds long
> sequences of define-key calls.  This looks much better to me:
>
> (keymap-set some-map
>   "a" 'command-a
>   "b" 'command-b
>   "c" 'command-c)

I think that makes sense, and we'd just have to extend the definition
from

(keymap-set KEYMAP KEY DEFINITION)

to

(keymap-set KEYMAP KEY DEFINITION &rest PAIRS)

But how should the indentation be?  It's not a definition form, so
indenting it like the above would be unusual.