Re: master 48ac40e60e: ; Fix last change.

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 22:37:10 -0400
> 
> > Sorry, I reject the idea that abstract classes cannot be usefully
> > documented in concrete terms.  At least there's no excuse for not
> > trying.
> 
> I'm not opposed to doing it, but I feel that it's not sufficient because
> it doesn't say why that abstract class exists (i.e. what it is that
> makes it meaningful to group those different classes under that abstract
> class).

I have nothing against adding something along those lines.

> How 'bout the patch below?

Fine with me, thanks.