[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: Abysmal state of GTK build |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Aug 2022 08:47:09 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> I don't understand: don't the non-GTK builds also support XInput2? If
> so, and if we make one of those non-GTK builds the default, people
> will still have an XInput2 build, just not a GTK one. Or what am I
> missing?
I meant if the GTK build is to stay the default.
> If the default, non-GTK, build supports XInput2, then why is it a
> problem to have the GTK build use XInput2 only as an opt-in feature?
There is no problem with that, but only if GTK is turned off.
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, (continued)
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Po Lu, 2022/08/22
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/22
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Po Lu, 2022/08/22
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/22
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Po Lu, 2022/08/22
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/22
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Po Lu, 2022/08/22
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/24
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Po Lu, 2022/08/24
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/22
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build,
Po Lu <=
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/22
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Po Lu, 2022/08/22
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/23
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Richard Stallman, 2022/08/23
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Jean Louis, 2022/08/22
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Po Lu, 2022/08/23
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/23
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Po Lu, 2022/08/23
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/23
- Re: Abysmal state of GTK build, Richard Stallman, 2022/08/24