Re: emacs-28 a866674b2a: Fix inaccuracies in "lax search" documentation

[Juri Linkov]

>     >>>> > Should we make `char-fold-to-regexp' into a command and refer to it
>     >>>> > from here? Or add something like `char-fold-show-equivalences'?
>     >>>>
>     >>>> A better name would be `describe-char-fold'.
>     >>>
>     >>> For a command, I'd say describe-character-foldings.  But
>     >>> char-fold-show-equivalences is IMO a better name.
>     >>
>     >> All similar commands have names starting with the `describe-' prefix 
> like
>     >> `describe-char', `describe-character-set'.  So maybe then
>     >> `describe-char-fold-equivalences'.
>
>     Juri> Ok, then let's use describe-char-fold-equivalences:
>
> Ah, that lists *all* the equivalences. I was thinking more along the
> lines of the following (we can give it a different name, or combine them)

The new command 'describe-char-fold-equivalences' that combines both
approaches is pushed now.  Thanks for helping to add this useful feature.