|
From: | Jim Porter |
Subject: | Re: master updated (5af5ed6c62 -> f07505d1ec) |
Date: | Tue, 6 Sep 2022 15:46:46 -0700 |
On 9/6/2022 1:13 PM, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
Sounds good to me. Try pushing it and see what EMBA says... (By the way, I see now that the test doesn't fail reliably on EMBA -- it passed at least once. So perhaps there's some timing/pipelining issue here? That is, it's outputting "first" and then "\n" in two separate writes, but sometimes we get both in the same process output and sometimes in two bits?)
Hmm, in that case, I think my patch would be hiding a real bug (though possibly just a bug in that test). I'll see if I can force it to fail locally, or failing that, we can mark it unstable. I think that would be better than working around the bug in the test...
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |