Re: Call for volunteers: add tree-sitter support to major modes

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 11.10.2022 10:31, Po Lu wrote:
> I'm not disputing that fact, which is why I proposed to write an
> *implementation*  of tree-sitter for inclusion with Emacs, and not to
> develop an equivalent in-house.

If you're confident in your ability to do so, why no wait until it seems 
likely that tree-sitter is about to become defunct/bitrot/abandoned, 
before doing that?

At that point is will either become clear that reimplementing or 
maintaining it ourselves is a good idea (perhaps with Emacs specifics), 
or some reasonably similar competing technology arises, which we would 
be able to migrate to.