Re: Understanding end-of-defun

[Yuan Fu]

> On Oct 27, 2022, at 8:25 AM, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
> 
>>> No, you're quite right.  We should double check that
>>> `beginning-of-defun-raw` was successful (and do something else if not).
>> How about:
> 
> I haven't had a chance to try it out, but it looks good to me, tho
> `beginning-of-defun-raw` doesn't mention anything about its return value
> in the its docstring, so we may want to tweak that docstring (and
> review its code to make sure that it indeed returns the value we need
> in all cases, tho I suspect you've done so already).

(Sorry for the delay) Yes, it returns nil in all cases. Pretty sure that’s the 
intent from the very beginning (looking at git logs). How about this patch?

Yuan

end-of-defun.diff
Description: Binary data