Re: Understanding end-of-defun

[Stefan Monnier]

>> I haven't had a chance to try it out, but it looks good to me, tho
>> `beginning-of-defun-raw` doesn't mention anything about its return value
>> in the its docstring, so we may want to tweak that docstring (and
>> review its code to make sure that it indeed returns the value we need
>> in all cases, tho I suspect you've done so already).
>
> (Sorry for the delay) Yes, it returns nil in all cases. Pretty sure that’s
> the intent from the very beginning (looking at git logs). How about
> this patch?

LGTM, thank you!


        Stefan


PS: I'm very happy to work with you: I just babble about and you
    go and do the grunt work.  Half kidding, obviously, but really,
    I appreciate it, thank you.