[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Nov 2022 07:59:26 +0100 |
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 07:19:45AM +0100, xenodasein--- via Emacs development
discussions. wrote:
[...]
> Why do you not consider __attribute__((always_inline)) an improvement
> over macros where applicable?
I think you spelled it yourself: "where applicable": this is
something which has to be considered on a case by case basis.
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, (continued)
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/15
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Richard Stallman, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, xenodasein, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Po Lu, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions,
tomas <=
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, xenodasein, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Stefan Monnier, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2022/11/18
Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Po Lu, 2022/11/15
Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Stefan Monnier, 2022/11/15