Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions

[Po Lu]

xenodasein@tutanota.de writes:

> Lookup why functions are considered an improvement over macros.

I don't.

> As for compiler support, I bet the time spent debugging where there is
> support is going to dwarf where isn't, so trade-off is clear.

You mean, trading debugging time for runtime? That tradeoff was already
made the moment Emacs was written in C, and besides, modern debuginfo
formats already support macros.