Re: Plug treesit.el into other emacs constructs

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no>
> Cc: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>, emacs-devel@gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 21:57:31 +0100
> 
> Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no> writes:
> 
> > Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no> writes:
> >
> >> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> >>
> >>>> If this code is plugged into transpose-sexps we get this nice behavior:
> >>>
> >>> It's a bit different from what SMIE would do, but there's a lot of
> >>> overlap and when it's different it's arguably better, so sounds good
> >>> to me.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Great!
> >>
> >>>> Now forward/backward-sexp can actually work a little differently, as you
> >>>> suggest, or we can let it use the same "move over siblings"-semantic.
> >>>> In that case we don't even need the treesit-sexp-type-regexp variables to
> >>>> control this, I think.
> >>>>
> >>>> What do you think?
> >>>
> >>> I'm not sufficiently familiar with the tree-sitter tree to foresee
> >>> precisely how it would affect `forward/backward-sexp`, but I think you
> >>> have a good enough understanding to make a good judgment at this
> >>> point :-)
> >>
> >> Great. I'll prepare a patch for this behavior, and we can discuss the
> >> forward-* commands after that.
> >>
> >
> > What do you think about this?  Feel free to try it and let me know if
> > something is completely wrong :-)
> 
> Now you can use 'arg' as well.

Stefan, Yuan: any comments or objections to installing this on master?