[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Dec 2022 19:03:41 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org, casouri@gmail.com
> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 11:30:44 -0500
>
> > I am not sure what you are referring to here. My point was just that
> > features that have to be enabled manually are usually never enabled by
> > non-enthusiasts (which I believe are the majority, even for Emacs).
>
> FWIW, I think it's perfectly OK if that's how it plays out in Emacs-29.
> That gives us a freer hand to improve the integration in Emacs>29.
Agreed. AFAIR, that was one of the reasons we eventually decided to
go this way in Emacs 29.
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, (continued)
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/31
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Stefan Monnier, 2022/12/30
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Richard Stallman, 2022/12/31
- Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s, Gregory Heytings, 2022/12/30