[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] Re: should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ?
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] Re: should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ? |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:12:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Štěpán,
Štěpán Němec <address@hidden> writes:
> FWIW, I do. Having [Org] (or anything, really) prepended to the subjects
> of _all_ mails coming from a list that is already uniquely identifiable
> (e.g. by its address) has no information value altogether (unlike
> [Babel], [PATCH] etc.) and only takes up the much precious Subject:
> header space.
Not that reducing the label from [Orgmode] to [Org] already seem to be a
progress in the right direction :)
Would you object having [Org] instead of [Orgmode]?
> I have never understood why anyone would like anything like that.
As Giovanni recalled, this is a standard GNU practice and I won't break
it. Maybe this is a leftover from the time when most used email clients
had no clever filters -- but maybe it's still useful for web archiving
or other purposes I cannot think of right now.
Cheers,
--
Bastien