[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Orgmode] Re: [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with languag
From: |
Sébastien Vauban |
Subject: |
[Orgmode] Re: [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:32:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (windows-nt) |
Hi Eric,
"Eric Schulte" wrote:
> Sébastien Vauban <address@hidden> writes:
>> "Eric Schulte" wrote:
>>> I've just pushed up a new header argument combination ":comments noweb"
>>> which will wrap all embedded noweb sections in link comments, as
>>> demonstrated in the following example. Hopefully this should be
>>> sufficient for a complete mapping from a pure code file back to the
>>> original org-mode file.
>>
>> If I understand correctly, this is some sort of enhancement to the ":comments
>> yes" option.
>>
>> If yes, is there a reason to have both values, with subtle differences?
>> Shouldn't we port the behavior of ":comments noweb" to the ":comments yes"
>> value?
>
> Yes, the reason to retain both variants is that in the case of short
> noweb references embedded in a single line, e.g.
>
> #+source: first
> #+begin_src ruby
> 5
> #+end_src
>
> #+begin_src ruby :noweb yes
> <<first>> + 6
> #+end_src
>
> the yes option would be preferable, as the insertion of comments around
> the noweb reference would result in adding line breaks around the
> reference and possibly breaking new-line sensitive code.
I see. I do second your choice...
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sébastien Vauban
- Re: [Orgmode] [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language, (continued)
- Re: [Orgmode] [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language, Eric S Fraga, 2011/01/10
- Re: [Orgmode] [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language, Eric S Fraga, 2011/01/13
- Re: [Orgmode] [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language, Seth Burleigh, 2011/01/13
- Re: [Orgmode] [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language, Eric Schulte, 2011/01/13
- Re: [Orgmode] [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language, Seth Burleigh, 2011/01/13
- Re: [Orgmode] [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language, Eric Schulte, 2011/01/16
- [Orgmode] Re: [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language, Sébastien Vauban, 2011/01/17
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language, Eric Schulte, 2011/01/17
- [Orgmode] Re: [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language,
Sébastien Vauban <=
- Re: [Orgmode] [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language, Seth Burleigh, 2011/01/17
- [Orgmode] Re: [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language, Sébastien Vauban, 2011/01/17
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language, Seth Burleigh, 2011/01/18
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language, Seth Burleigh, 2011/01/18
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language, Seth Burleigh, 2011/01/18
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language, Eric Schulte, 2011/01/19
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language, Seth Burleigh, 2011/01/24
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language, Bastien, 2011/01/18
- [Orgmode] Re: [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language, Dan Davison, 2011/01/24
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language, Eric S Fraga, 2011/01/24