[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Illiterate programming question
From: |
Sean O'Halpin |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Illiterate programming question |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Apr 2011 03:29:02 +0100 |
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Nick Dokos <address@hidden> wrote:
> Sean O'Halpin <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Eric Schulte <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > Babel does have a way to bring changes back from pure source code into
>> > code blocks in an Org-mode document. While it isn't perfect (especially
>> > if you make extensive use of noweb references or variables) there are
>> > mechanisms to maintain such a /sync/. To try this out, tangle out code
>> > with the ":comments yes" header argument, then change an element of the
>> > tangled source code, and use the `org-babel-detangle' function to bring
>> > the changes back into the Org-mode document.
>> >
>> > Improving the detangling (or "illiterate") features is an area ripe for
>> > future Babel development.
>> >
>> > Cheers -- Eric
>> >
>> >
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could anyone please give a working example of this? I tried tangling
>> the following:
>>
>> * A tangle example
>>
>> #+source: body
>> #+begin_src ruby :comments yes :noweb yes
>> puts "hello"
>> #+end_src
>>
>> #+source: method
>> #+begin_src ruby :comments yes :noweb yes
>> def hello
>> <<body>>
>> end
>> #+end_src
>>
>> #+source: main
>> #+begin_src ruby :comments yes :tangle detangle.rb :noweb yes
>> <<method>>
>> hello
>> #+end_src
>>
>> and got the output:
>>
>> # [[][main]]
>>
>> def hello
>> puts "hello"
>> end
>> hello
>>
>> # main ends here
>>
>> which doesn't look right to me.
>>
>
> What should it look like?
>
> Nick
>
To be honest, I don't know what it /should/ look like but I have ':comments yes'
on three sections and get only one link on output, so I can't see how this
would detangle properly.
Also,
# [[][main]]
is missing the file reference (in the first set of brackets), so it
won't work as a link.
Regards,
Sean
P.S. Apologies again for not replying to all first time.
- [O] Illiterate programming question, Robert Goldman, 2011/03/30
- Re: [O] Illiterate programming question, Nick Dokos, 2011/03/30
- Re: [O] Illiterate programming question, Erik Iverson, 2011/03/30
- Re: [O] Illiterate programming question, Robert Goldman, 2011/03/30
- Re: Re: [O] Illiterate programming question, chris . m . malone, 2011/03/30
- [O] Re: Illiterate programming question, Sébastien Vauban, 2011/03/30
- Re: [O] Illiterate programming question, Eric Schulte, 2011/03/30
- Re: [O] Illiterate programming question, Sean O'Halpin, 2011/03/31
- Re: [O] Illiterate programming question, Nick Dokos, 2011/03/31
- Re: [O] Illiterate programming question,
Sean O'Halpin <=