[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD
From: |
Yagnesh Raghava Yakkala |
Subject: |
Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Feb 2013 22:55:32 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
[Earlier mail has been sent prematurely.]
> If I say Yagnesh has made zero contributions to Tamil Poetry does it
> amount to attacking you. Think about it.
Sorry to say, that is very bad comparison. Seems you are trying to nullify
Bastien's efforts.
Though I don't want to quantify, here is one data point,
org-committers.png
Description: PNG image
Not to forget taking maintainer-ship itself is big deal.
I wonder how much contribution(s) sum up zero+ for you. But personally for me
a contributor doesn't need to add any code commits. I start counting
contributors
from those up-voters on reddit/hacker-news for org/fsf threads.
In anyway, pointing each other doesn't do any good and I think I wrote more
than I am supposed to in this thread. So I will shut up on this.
Thanks.,
--
ఎందరో మహానుభావులు అందరికి వందనములు.
YYR
- [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Dominik, Carsten, 2013/02/11
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/11
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Yagnesh Raghava Yakkala, 2013/02/11
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/11
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Yagnesh Raghava Yakkala, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD,
Yagnesh Raghava Yakkala <=
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Carsten Dominik, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Samuel Wales, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Rainer Stengele, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Evan Misshula, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Daniel Clemente, 2013/02/12
Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Thomas S. Dye, 2013/02/11
Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Eric S Fraga, 2013/02/11