[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [ox, patch] external compilation
From: |
Rasmus |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [ox, patch] external compilation |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Feb 2015 19:21:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:
>> No this has the same issue as the Makefile. "It's not as easy as latex".
>
> Setting up a publishing project is easy and well documented.
So is Makefile.
>> I want *one* coherent file with all the necessary instructions, that can
>> be edited in different program from Emacs, and be easily compiled.
>>
>> E.g. I wrote syntax highlight for Org in texworks, but I also want to make
>> the "green button" work easily as latex without too many ugly hacks.
>
> Isn't a file local variable enough then?
It's not interpret in a batch call by default (which may be a feature that
is not wise to mess with).
> Also, what about the (let ((org-export-async-init-file ...))) suggested
> earlier?
How to I generalize this to a emacs --batch call from a random org file?
—Rasmus
--
The second rule of Fight Club is: You do not talk about Fight Club
- [O] External compilation, Rasmus, 2015/02/19
- Re: [O] External compilation, Sebastien Vauban, 2015/02/19
- [O] [ox, patch] external compilation (was: External compilation), Rasmus, 2015/02/20
- Re: [O] [ox, patch] external compilation, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/02/20
- Re: [O] [ox, patch] external compilation, Rasmus, 2015/02/20
- Re: [O] [ox, patch] external compilation, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/02/20
- Re: [O] [ox, patch] external compilation,
Rasmus <=
- Re: [O] [ox, patch] external compilation, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/02/20
- Re: [O] [ox, patch] external compilation, Rasmus, 2015/02/20
- Re: [O] [ox, patch] external compilation, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/02/21
- Re: [O] [ox, patch] external compilation, Rasmus, 2015/02/21
- Re: [O] [ox, patch] external compilation, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/02/21
- Re: [O] [ox, patch] external compilation, Rasmus, 2015/02/21