Re: "Unknown processor biblatex"

[Colin Baxter]

Dear Eric,

>>>>> Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> writes:

    > Colin, I also only use the basics when writing articles.  With the
    > new org-cite, the closest I have is with the following settings,
    > as an example:

    > #+cite_export: natbib plain #+latex_header:
    > \usepackage[numbers,sort,super]{natbib}

    > #+bibliography: ~/[...]/bibliography.bib

    > This converts the simplest [cite:@author] to \citep{author}.
    > Natbib settings need to be adjusted to your tastes/needs, of
    > course.

    > In my org configuration, I have

    > #+begin_src emacs-lisp (require 'oc-basic) (require 'oc-csl)
    > (require 'oc-natbib) #+end_src

    > to cover all the bases.

    > I have not been able to get away from using natbib for LaTeX
    > export, unfortunately.  A simple basic bibtex org-cite exporter
    > would be welcome, one that simply generates \cite{author} without
    > any frills.

    > It's important to highlight that, to me, the advantage of
    > org-cite, over what I was using before with my own cite: link
    > definition, is that changing that first line to something like

    > #+cite_export: csl "[...]/acm-siggraph.csl"

    > lets me export the same document to ODT or text with the
    > citations.  It's not something I need often but I did in fact need
    > it just recently and was greatly welcome!

Thank you very much for your interesting reply. For "serious" work I've
always used only LaTeX, reserving org-mode for notes; consequently for
me, there not much motivation to get the new org-mode cite to
work. However I'll give your settings a try.

Best wishes,

Colin.