[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [org-cite] add convention for direct commands, process for adding ma
|
From: |
Bruce D'Arcus |
|
Subject: |
Re: [org-cite] add convention for direct commands, process for adding mappings to export processor(s)? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 10 Oct 2021 16:56:12 -0400 |
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 4:41 PM Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:
> >> And if we were to add this, we'd still need to answer my first
> >> question: when and how to add specific style/variant mappings to the
> >> oc processors.
>
> It is possible to send a patch if it is something useful. Some
> processors (probably only biblatex at this point, we probably cover
> everything in natbib) may also introduce a customizable variable for
> user-defined styles.
Ah yes; that's a better solution.
And I agree; it mostly makes sense for biblatex (though I saw someone
on reddit asking about natbib \bibentry, which is what reminded me
about this).
It's not needed for oc-csl, because of the tight integration of that
with citeproc-el.
Bruce