[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0
From: |
John Kitchin |
Subject: |
Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0 |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Mar 2022 11:33:26 -0400 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.6.10; emacs 28.0.90 |
I have updated the readme in org-ref to indicate you can use both
packages.
Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> writes:
> On 21/03/2022 18:51, John Kitchin wrote:
>> Vikas Rawal writes:
>>>
>>> From the perspective of a user, this was only meant to express a
>>> sentiment that one finds oneself in a situation of having to choose
>>> between two good things, and that we have not been able to find a way
>>> to make both compatible with each other. It was in not meant as a
>>> disrespect in any way.
>> I don't think you have to choose. You can use org-cite for
>> citations, and org-ref for cross-references. The citation syntax is
>> orthogonal, you just should not mix them. You can even wire org-ref to
>> use org-cite-insert like this:
>> (setq org-ref-insert-cite-function (lambda () (org-cite-insert nil)))
>
> I am glad to read this. John, could you, please, update the README file for
> https://github.com/jkitchin/org-ref to clarify that both packages may be used
> within the same document while org-ref is used solely for cross-references (I
> may create a github issue if your prefer)? From my point of view the following
> phrase may be considered as prohibitive in respect to combining the packages
> for
> any purpose:
>
>> You can use both org-cite and org-ref (although you should not do that in the
>> same document as they are independent citation tools).
> I feel some ambiguity in the starting message in this thread:
>
> Vikas Rawal, Sun, 20 Mar 2022 17:38:30 +0530.
> CALtzAB2BHULDOXaamUZFQh2H453Ekb6K7bkOHbU-dHPn98avwg@mail.gmail.com">https://list.orgmode.org/CALtzAB2BHULDOXaamUZFQh2H453Ekb6K7bkOHbU-dHPn98avwg@mail.gmail.com
>
>> This obviously creates many problems including that two people using
>> different citation systems cannot share org files.
> Accordingly to the org-ref README installed org-ref package does not break
> org-cite, so people are free to share documents. They just should have both
> packages configured and should adhere to a chosen package in each document
> (for
> *citations*).
--
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803
@johnkitchin
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu
Pronouns: he/him/his
- Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0, (continued)
- Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0, John Kitchin, 2022/03/21
- Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0, Bruce D'Arcus, 2022/03/21
- Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0, John Kitchin, 2022/03/21
- Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0, Vikas Rawal, 2022/03/20
- Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0, John Kitchin, 2022/03/21
- Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0, Vikas Rawal, 2022/03/21
- Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0, Max Nikulin, 2022/03/25
- Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0,
John Kitchin <=
- Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0, Vikas Rawal, 2022/03/27
- Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0, Max Nikulin, 2022/03/25
- Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0, Bruce D'Arcus, 2022/03/26
- Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0, John Kitchin, 2022/03/27
- Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0, Max Nikulin, 2022/03/28
- Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0, Bruce D'Arcus, 2022/03/28
- Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0, Max Nikulin, 2022/03/29
- Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0, Bruce D'Arcus, 2022/03/29
- Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0, Denis Maier, 2022/03/30
- Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0, Max Nikulin, 2022/03/31