[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bash results broken?
|
From: |
Matt |
|
Subject: |
Re: Bash results broken? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 25 Dec 2022 21:25:02 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Zoho Mail |
---- On Sun, 25 Dec 2022 06:23:53 -0500 Ihor Radchenko wrote ---
> As you see, "%S" have been used previously for non-string results.
> I cannot find explanation in git log.
>
> That said, I think that it will be more consistent to leave strings
> specifically as is. See the attached patch.
That makes sense and works for me.
ob-shell intentions and paperwork (was Bash results broken?), Matt, 2022/12/21
- Re: ob-shell intentions and paperwork (was Bash results broken?), Matt, 2022/12/27
- Re: ob-shell intentions and paperwork (was Bash results broken?), Ihor Radchenko, 2022/12/29
- Re: ob-shell intentions and paperwork (was Bash results broken?), Bastien Guerry, 2022/12/29
- Re: ob-shell intentions and paperwork (was Bash results broken?), Matt, 2022/12/30
- Re: ob-shell intentions and paperwork (was Bash results broken?), Bastien Guerry, 2022/12/30
- Re: ob-shell intentions and paperwork (was Bash results broken?), Matt, 2022/12/30
- Re: ob-shell intentions and paperwork (was Bash results broken?), Ihor Radchenko, 2022/12/31
Re: ob-shell intentions and paperwork (was Bash results broken?), Ihor Radchenko, 2022/12/31