[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fenfire-dev] Yet another libvob API: LWJGL

From: Benja Fallenstein
Subject: Re: [Fenfire-dev] Yet another libvob API: LWJGL
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:39:26 +0200

> Right, was one of the requirements to have as few JNI calls per frame as
> possible? And was this a reason why none of the wrappers would do, as
> they concentrate on games? Perhaps that part of Fenfire could find its way
> to one of the other wrappers.

Tuomas's design as I understand it (and I'm just saying this without
passing value judgement, because I know far too little about this area
of coding to do so[*]) was to have O(1) (zero?) JNI calls per frame.
We can't possibly hope to be *that* good with the Java binding

[*] Of course, that is exactly why having the code in Java would be a
good thing...

- Benja

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]