Re: [Fenfire-dev] Yet another libvob API: LWJGL

[Benja Fallenstein]

> Right, was one of the requirements to have as few JNI calls per frame as
> possible? And was this a reason why none of the wrappers would do, as
> they concentrate on games? Perhaps that part of Fenfire could find its way
> to one of the other wrappers.

Tuomas's design as I understand it (and I'm just saying this without
passing value judgement, because I know far too little about this area
of coding to do so[*]) was to have O(1) (zero?) JNI calls per frame.
We can't possibly hope to be *that* good with the Java binding
libraries.

[*] Of course, that is exactly why having the code in Java would be a
good thing...

- Benja