[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [fluid-dev] possible 1.1.3 bug
From: |
Ray Rashif |
Subject: |
Re: [fluid-dev] possible 1.1.3 bug |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:33:04 +0800 |
On 20 October 2010 15:03, Max McCracken <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Matt Giuca <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> > (Btw I am not a FluidSynth developer, I'm just interested.)
>>>
>>> Oh? Should I also post a bug report somewhere then?
>>
>> There is a bug tracker here:
>> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/fluidsynth/report
>>
>> I don't think it gets used much though. It only has 6 active tickets. I get
>> the feeling that bug reports get more exposure on this list than that
>> tracker.
>>
>
> Okay then, I won't bother :)
That's really not the right attitude - you are harming yourself. No
matter the traffic, filing bug reports is a good habit. Keeping
problems stored away in discussions is only a way to lose them.
One or two bugs did get solved within the last month in the tracker.
- [fluid-dev] possible 1.1.3 bug, Max McCracken, 2010/10/19
- Re: [fluid-dev] possible 1.1.3 bug, Matt Giuca, 2010/10/19
- Re: [fluid-dev] possible 1.1.3 bug, Max McCracken, 2010/10/20
- Re: [fluid-dev] possible 1.1.3 bug, Matt Giuca, 2010/10/20
- Re: [fluid-dev] possible 1.1.3 bug, Max McCracken, 2010/10/20
- Re: [fluid-dev] possible 1.1.3 bug, Matt Giuca, 2010/10/20
- Re: [fluid-dev] possible 1.1.3 bug, Max McCracken, 2010/10/20
- Re: [fluid-dev] possible 1.1.3 bug,
Ray Rashif <=
- Re: [fluid-dev] possible 1.1.3 bug, Max McCracken, 2010/10/20