[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [fluid-dev] [ANNOUNCE] FluidSynth 1.1.4 released!
From: |
Orcan Ogetbil |
Subject: |
Re: [fluid-dev] [ANNOUNCE] FluidSynth 1.1.4 released! |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Aug 2011 21:26:16 -0400 |
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Matt Giuca wrote:
> I'm not familiar with CMake or Fedora, but I do know how Debian
> packages work. It sounds like a difference of opinion between the
> upstream (FluidSynth) and distro (Fedora) -- these sort of differences
> happen all the time. In Debian, there is a system in place for
> maintaining patches against the upstream.
>
> There are often legitimate reasons for these differences (for
> instance, the upstream legitimately wants to install to /usr/local/lib
> and the distro legitimately wants to install to /usr/lib). So does
> Fedora / RPM have anything in place where the distro could maintain an
> altered CMake file for their purposes, without requiring the changes
> be pushed upstream into the FluidSynth repository?
>
Yes we can override the default Fedora's cmake behavior. My point here
is, our default cmake behavior conflicts only with fluidsynth-1.1.4,
while it was working fine with any other cmake package, even with
fluidsynth-1.1.3. Is this change between 1.1.3 and 1.1.4 really
necessary?
Thanks,
Orcan
- [fluid-dev] Re : [ANNOUNCE] FluidSynth 1.1.4 released!, (continued)
Re: [fluid-dev] [ANNOUNCE] FluidSynth 1.1.4 released!, Orcan Ogetbil, 2011/08/04
- Re: [fluid-dev] [ANNOUNCE] FluidSynth 1.1.4 released!, James Ong, 2011/08/04
- Re: [fluid-dev] [ANNOUNCE] FluidSynth 1.1.4 released!, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas, 2011/08/04
- Re: [fluid-dev] [ANNOUNCE] FluidSynth 1.1.4 released!, Orcan Ogetbil, 2011/08/04
- Re: [fluid-dev] [ANNOUNCE] FluidSynth 1.1.4 released!, Orcan Ogetbil, 2011/08/05
- Re: [fluid-dev] [ANNOUNCE] FluidSynth 1.1.4 released!, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas, 2011/08/05
- Re: [fluid-dev] [ANNOUNCE] FluidSynth 1.1.4 released!, Orcan Ogetbil, 2011/08/05