Re: [pooma-dev] question in Intersector.h

[Julian Cummings]

Hi Stephen,

Stephen Smith wrote:

> That change would be fine.  The standard in other
> parts of POOMA seems to be to declare them private,
> but provide no definition.  If you change it, could
> you make the same change in Evaluator/SimpleIntersector.h?

OK, will do.

> For what it's worth, the C++ standard seems to tell
> that code was ok... but I've often seen g++ report
> syntax errors in unused member functions of implicitly
> instantiated templates before.

Yes, I think the trouble here comes from whether
or not those unused member functions get compiled.

Julian C.


--
Dr. Julian C. Cummings                       E-mail: address@hidden
California Institute of Technology           Phone:  626-395-2543
1200 E. California Blvd., Mail Code 158-79   Fax:    626-584-5917
Pasadena, CA 91125