Re: [pooma-dev] [Q] ReceiveIterate asymmetry bug?

[Richard Guenther]

On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Richard Guenther wrote:

> Hi!
>
> ReceiveIterate looks suspiciously asymmetric wrt POOMA_REORDER_ITERATES,
> as a write request is always allocated, but for !POOMA_REORDER_ITERATES
> the request is not released. May I suggest doing the release in the
> destructor, as it is done for the SendIterate?  I suppose this may be
> because the run() method doesnt block in all cases?  In which case there
> would be a bug, as the ReceiveIterate object would get destroyed, but the
> static apply method still gets arguments referencing it?
>
> How is this supposed to work?

Just to mention it, I see random repeatable deadlocks and faults with
blockingExpressions(false) and the serial async scheduler using cheetah
that are cured using blockingExpressions(true).

Richard.

--
Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at uni-tuebingen dot de>
WWW: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/