Re: [pooma-dev] Open-Source licensing

[John H . Hall]

So do we need to take it out as open source also?
John Hall
On Jul 6, 2004, at 3:56 PM, James Crotinger wrote:

> SMARTS was ACL. 
>
>         Jim 
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> James A. Crotinger                           email:     address@hidden 
> NumeriX, LLC                                 phone:  (505) 424-4477 x104 
> 2960 Rodeo Park Dr. W. 
> Santa Fe, NM 87505 
>
> > -----Original Message----- 
> > From: John H. Hall [mailto:address@hidden] 
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 1:52 PM 
> > To: 'address@hidden' 
> > Cc: Scott Haney; John Hall; Stephen Smith 
> > Subject: [pooma-dev] Open-Source licensing 
> > 
> > Gang: 
> > I have now been asked officially by Jeff Brown (LANL CCS-DO) to get 
> > these licensing issues straightened out which makes it official work 
> > instead of a part-time hobby. So I need to know which packages y'all 
> > want transferred out. I prefer the BSD license myself of the existing 
> > licenses out there but I am open to debate on this issue. So here is 
> > what I seem to remember. 
> > 
> > We want: 
> > 
> > Cheetah 
> > Pete 
> > Pooma R1 and R2 (R1 for compatibility issues) 
> > 
> > from the ACL. 
> > 
> > (Someone needs to remind me what is wrong with the license R2 was taken 
> > out under so I don't go down the same path.) 
> > 
> > And I would like to take out: 
> > 
> > TecFramework 
> > Poomalote 
> > Physics Support Layer 
> > 
> > from the now defunct Blanca project. 
> > 
> > Are there any other items I need to put in the hopper. Is this list 
> > sufficient for the VSIPL people? 
> > 
> > Thanks, 
> > John Hall 
> > New Open-Source minion 
> > 
> > P.S. Who owns the smarts package?