freepooma-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [pooma-dev] Open-Source licensing


From: James Crotinger
Subject: RE: [pooma-dev] Open-Source licensing
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 14:06:39 -0600

I'd talk to Ron Minnich or someone back at the lab. If the lab isn't planning further work on these, then I don't see why not. Hmm - even if they are, I don't see why not. So why not?

 

Cheers,

 

            Jim

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
James A. Crotinger                           email:    
address@hidden
NumeriX, LLC                                 phone:  (505) 424-4477 x104
2960 Rodeo Park Dr. W.
Santa Fe, NM 87505

 


From: John H. Hall [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 2:05 PM
To: 'address@hidden'; James Crotinger
Cc: Scott Haney; Stephen Smith
Subject: Re: [pooma-dev] Open-Source licensing

 

So do we need to take it out as open source also?

John Hall

On Jul 6, 2004, at 3:56 PM, James Crotinger wrote:

 

SMARTS was ACL.

 

        Jim

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------

James A. Crotinger                           email:     address@hidden

NumeriX, LLC                                 phone:  (505) 424-4477 x104

2960 Rodeo Park Dr. W.

Santa Fe, NM 87505

 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: John H. Hall [mailto:address@hidden]

> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 1:52 PM

> To: 'address@hidden'

> Cc: Scott Haney; John Hall; Stephen Smith

> Subject: [pooma-dev] Open-Source licensing

>

> Gang:

> I have now been asked officially by Jeff Brown (LANL CCS-DO) to get

> these licensing issues straightened out which makes it official work

> instead of a part-time hobby. So I need to know which packages y'all

> want transferred out. I prefer the BSD license myself of the existing

> licenses out there but I am open to debate on this issue. So here is

> what I seem to remember.

>

> We want:

>

> Cheetah

> Pete

> Pooma R1 and R2 (R1 for compatibility issues)

>

> from the ACL.

>

> (Someone needs to remind me what is wrong with the license R2 was taken

> out under so I don't go down the same path.)

>

> And I would like to take out:

>

> TecFramework

> Poomalote

> Physics Support Layer

>

> from the now defunct Blanca project.

>

> Are there any other items I need to put in the hopper. Is this list

> sufficient for the VSIPL people?

>

> Thanks,

> John Hall

> New Open-Source minion

>

> P.S. Who owns the smarts package?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]