[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [glob2-devel] Release
From: |
Bradley Arsenault |
Subject: |
Re: [glob2-devel] Release |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:19:33 -0500 |
On 1/18/07, Kai Antweiler <address@hidden> wrote:
> It is very critical, however, that the new code is well documented.
> This is sort of a new rule, all new code must be well documented.
> We use doxygen. You can read up on doxygen on its website.
No, we should not enforce doxygen.
We can suggest to use it - but insisting on it would be wrong.
Our workforce is too small to put up additional obstacles.
It doesn't matter that doxygen is not difficult to use.
Most amateur programmers I know even shy away from version control
systems or Makefiles.
The normal "//"-comments in the code (even in broken english) must be
enough!
By the way:
I have never used doxygen. Is it really favorable?
The only code documentation tool I ever used was cweb.
And I was very disappointed.
--
Kai Antweiler
_______________________________________________
glob2-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
Making doxygen comments is trivial. there is only two things to remember:
1) Add comments before the line being commented (etc class, function definition)
2) Use ///, not //, doyxgen detects ///
Doxygen does an very good job of doing the rest, organizing
everything, generating html, etc...
--
Whats long and hard and filled with seamen? My submarine! - Bradley Arsenault