Re: [glob2-devel] Release naming changes proposal

[Joey Marshall]

On 1/23/07, Kai Antweiler <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've the feeling that we are suffering from our current release naming scheme.
> > The asymptotic approach of 1.0 probably has a depressing effect. So here is a
> > suggestion (and it's only that, I'm interested in your opinions): why not
> > switching to a single int release naming, and treating all release as stable
> > ones?
>
> You mean like glob2-1, glob2-2, glob2-3, ... ?
> Ok.  That's mathematically and psychologically prettier.
>
> In a way we have two integers, because of the 2 in glob2.
> When we make a really big change we can go to glob3-1.
>
> Shall we do this on our next release or wait until Bradley
> finishes the network rewrite?
> Let's do it on our next release!

> From a user point of view, a change in the graphics
> (like optional tiles by fede) will make a bigger impression
> then the network.

I think stable net games are more important than multiple tile sets. :)


> So this would be a good time to change the naming scheme.
> --
> Kai Antweiler
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> glob2-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel


--
http://joey101.net - my blog on web development