[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Design proposal to kill pristine trees
From: |
Pau Aliagas |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Design proposal to kill pristine trees |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Oct 2003 12:09:50 +0200 (CEST) |
On 10 Oct 2003, Miles Bader wrote:
> Pau Aliagas <address@hidden> writes:
> > I have almost finished adding a `-d' option to all the library functions :)
> > First step in the right direction.
>
> I presume you mean all the user-level library functions;
Plus all the internal commands ;)
> what does it
> do when you _don't_ specify a directory (use the first thing in the
> path, something more clever?)?
In this first approximation, the default revision library is not changed.
Adding multi-path, if proved necessary, can be added in a second step. So
the behaviour will be backwards compatible,
Pau
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Design proposal to kill pristine trees, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Design proposal to kill pristine trees, Miles Bader, 2003/10/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Design proposal to kill pristine trees, Tom Lord, 2003/10/08
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Design proposal to kill pristine trees, Miles Bader, 2003/10/08
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Design proposal to kill pristine trees, Tom Lord, 2003/10/08
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Design proposal to kill pristine trees, Miles Bader, 2003/10/08
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Design proposal to kill pristine trees, Tom Lord, 2003/10/08
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Design proposal to kill pristine trees, Pau Aliagas, 2003/10/09
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Design proposal to kill pristine trees, Miles Bader, 2003/10/10
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Design proposal to kill pristine trees, Pau Aliagas, 2003/10/10
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Design proposal to kill pristine trees, Miles Bader, 2003/10/10
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Design proposal to kill pristine trees,
Pau Aliagas <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Design proposal to kill pristine trees, Pau Aliagas, 2003/10/13