[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Oct 2003 06:55:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 11:58:20AM -0700, Dustin Sallings wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, Oct 22, 2003, at 05:35 US/Pacific, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> >>Since perl has no number types,
> >
> >Totally wrong. Fundamentally so, even. Perl has three primitive
> >numeric types (two integer, one floating) plus a bunch of interesting
> >things done using magic, several of which are distributed in the core.
>
> This is clearly a matter of perspective. The closest type perl has
> is a scalar which is sometimes interpreted as a number if the
> conditions
> are correct. In my example, "0" by itself is considered a number for
> the condition, but "0.0" is not. Math is possible on both of them.
> String manipulation is possible on both of them. In fact, the only way
> to tell if a scalar is a number is to perform string pattern matching
> operations on it. Languages with numeric types don't have this issue.
You are simply wrong, and clearly do not understand perl scalars.
> >I've read the Fatal documentation carefully, and it most definitely
> >describes what it does accurately and precisely, and not what you say.
>
> I've read the documentation carefully as well, along with the
> source. However, such modules shouldn't be so obscure that this is
> necessary. It gives open and close as examples. It should be safe to
> assume that read and syswrite can be used the same way. They cannot.
So now you're saying that, in fact, the documentation is accurate and
your assumption is wrong?
> You said that only a moron would write code that doesn't check for
> all errors...er, unless it's writing to stdout or stderr since ENOSPC
> is
> obviously a temporary error and applications should queue up writes and
> try again later. Except yours since you specifically avoid checking
> the results in the first place.
Straw man. Yet again.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Robert Collins, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Dustin Sallings, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Dustin Sallings, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Dustin Sallings, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Dustin Sallings, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Dustin Sallings, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit,
Andrew Suffield <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Robert Collins, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Dustin Sallings, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Robert Collins, 2003/10/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Tom Lord, 2003/10/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Thomas Zander, 2003/10/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Samium Gromoff, 2003/10/20