Re: [Gnu-arch-users] how important is declaring 1.1?

[Robert Collins]

On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 08:14, Bruce Stephens wrote:
> Debian stable doesn't seem worth worrying about.  Debian testing is a
> more practical target.  Presumably other distributions would also be
> more keen to take something called 1.1.

the version # isn't the issue - the issue is that 1.1 isn't released yet
- it's still considered 'pre-release'.

> > Any objections?  Factual corrections about the debian process?
> 
> i don't see any mention of bug #5554/#5635, which is a big issue for
> people relying on implicit naming for many files.  It also appears to
> have a relatively simple patch (in bug 5554).

I'll review this tonight.

Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part