[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] 1.1 feature freeze
From: |
James Blackwell |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] 1.1 feature freeze |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:54:30 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 02:52:22PM -0800, Tom Lord wrote:
>
> > From: James Blackwell <address@hidden>
> > I'm aware of these outststanding issues, in order of importance:
> > 1. (This one comes from Andrew Suffield). The tree-lint and inventory
> > commands have a habit of listing .arch-ids in their output. This can
> > have some negative side effects when piped through a tla add command
> > that can catch both newbies and the unwary .
[snip]
>
> Not sure I follow exactly what the bug is (I have a guess though) but,
> yes, let's fix that.
The bug is that users unintentially do a "tla add .arch-ids/*". Though its
technically their fault, its happened to me enough times that I think we
should fix it.
If you're looking at a really short timeframe between freeze and 1.1
official it might be better if you or Andrew address this one. Though I
think the answer is probably in invent.c, I'm nervous that if I "fix"
invent.c so that intentory and tree-lint work the way that Andrew and I
want, I could cause an bug in unrelated code.
> > 2. Tla grab, which I really want in 1.1, is still broken. The problem
> > seems to be in the way that grab is calling through the pfs layer
> > (everything comes up 404).
>
> The tutorial is currently silent on it so I see no need to disable it.
> I have no objection to merging further fixes to it before 1.1 (nor
> plans to hold up 1.1 for fixes -- but you have a few days at least).
Ok. I'll try and get it done this weekend.
>
> > 3. tla 1.1 on shipment should have a library-browse command of some
>
> On the other hand, both library-browse and grab are arguably the kind
> of convenience commands that are "officially" one of the subjects of
> the 1.2 series.
I'm comfortable on 1.1.0 going out without a library-browse. However, I
think we should have it in an official release within the next three
months -- whether that's 1.2 or a 1.1.x.
--
James Blackwell Using I.T. to bring more 570-407-0488
Owner, Inframix business to your business http://inframix.com
GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] 1.1 feature freeze, Colin Walters, 2003/12/12