Re: [Gnu-arch-users] marking merges in --summary output

[Tom Lord]

    > From: Robert Anderson <address@hidden>

    >> I think it would be pretty handy to mark merge points in the
    >> --summary output.  Anyone else think so?

Yes.

    > More precisely, tla revisions --summary.

Similar to that on `tla logs' presumably?   Or how about also 
a short form.

The long form being:

        patch-L
        patch-M
          meres in:
            revision-name
            revision-name
            revision-name
        patch-N


the short being:

        patch-L
        patch-M         {merges}
        patch-N


-t