|
| From: | Samuel Tardieu |
| Subject: | [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Jan 2004 03:02:32 +0100 |
| User-agent: | T-gnus/6.16.2 (based on Gnus v5.10.2) (revision 02) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
>>>>> "Colin" == Colin Walters <address@hidden> writes: > That seems silly to me. In practice, I don't think anyone will use > anything else. Why not? While I favour GnuPG, I know some people who will want to use X.509 signatures generated by the "openssl" command-line program[1]. Sam Notes: [1] A future version of GnuPG will also use X.509 signatures. -- Samuel Tardieu -- address@hidden -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |