[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: signatures and checking
|
From: |
Samuel Tardieu |
|
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: signatures and checking |
|
Date: |
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 02:11:37 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
T-gnus/6.16.2 (based on Gnus v5.10.2) (revision 02) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> 1. Checksum data can be reliably extracted from them by tla
> _even_if_ the user has no ~/.arch-params/.../*.check file for the
> relevent archive.
> 2. They are "all in one" -- tla can read them, along with the
> signature, in a single file-fetch from the archive. In other words,
> detached signatures are not an option.
Wouldn't a tar file with checksums + detached signatures achieve what
you want? It does 1, it does 2, and it fixes the flaws that were
identified.
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- address@hidden -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam
- [Gnu-arch-users] signatures and checking, Tom Lord, 2004/01/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: signatures and checking,
Samuel Tardieu <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: signatures and checking, Miles Bader, 2004/01/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: signatures and checking, Tom Lord, 2004/01/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: signatures and checking, Tom Lord, 2004/01/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: signatures and checking, Andrew Suffield, 2004/01/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: signatures and checking, Tom Lord, 2004/01/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: signatures and checking, Robert Collins, 2004/01/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: signatures and checking, Tom Lord, 2004/01/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: signatures and checking, Neil Stevens, 2004/01/26
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] signatures and checking, Andrew Suffield, 2004/01/26