gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [Pika-dev] Funding Drive


From: Andrew Suffield
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [Pika-dev] Funding Drive
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 23:12:18 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i

On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 06:08:06PM -0500, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 18:02, Tom Lord wrote:
> 
> > I suspect that the feedback you were getting really meant something
> > _less_ like "I like self-contained systems" and something _more_ like
> > "Please get out of my office without making a fuss.  I honestly don't
> > care about this stuff."
> 
> "self-contained" is in the eye of the beholder, too.  One of the thing I
> *liked* about Arch vs Subversion was that it would work over plain HTTP.
> 
> But if I was installing Arch under Windows, I'd want to be able to run 1
> wizard, and have it all installed.  It wouldn't matter to me whether the
> wizard installed Cygwin.

You could most likely rig this with a couple hours and a copy of
InstallShield, if anybody has one lying around. It's commercial crap
but so is Windows.

> Reminds me of Debian.  Hmm, apt4win32... *ow*!

Some kook once suggested that seriously. It just ain't that easy. The
only path to greatness is treading on the faces of giants, or something
like that.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]